You ever notice how the bad guys always go for the kill and the good guys have to use non lethal means? We could get into an argument about the ethics of "justice" although I think it's just a bit silly to try and take the stance of "moral high ground" when someone is trying to kill you.

 A really good example is when talking about politics; Like what the FUCK do you mean poor folk have to work "within the system" to enact change when the billionaire class is actively killing people buy purchasing policy. To go even further is to say, why do you not expect a violent resistance from a population that is actively being starved and shot daily, especially since it has been going on for so long.

 Another thing that got my attention to this was in the movie "Hot Fuzz" there was a moment in which the 2 main characters are being held at gunpoint whilst their guard is down and the armed man (who already has killing intent) asks them to drop their weapons. 

This is the scenario the worker often finds themselves in; the ruling class is the ruling class because they lure you in to thinking you might have a chance to negotiate, when all that's happening is you are losing your weapon. I mean this literally as well. Authoritarians only keep power because they have weapons. I'm rambling, I feel like this is all obvious knowledge, but I digress, weapons are the great equalizer. David vs Goliath.